I've been studying a phenomena in audio "science". 32-bit-float recording. I've done many videos on it, some stories, here's one of the latest, but I wouldn't waste time watching. Here for reference: https://youtu.be/ZFhW0PQkFP4
The bottom line is content creators want a new super-power. They'd rather believe in a magic feature, that doesn't work, then the principles need to record good audio. Fascinating to me!
99.9% of science is dedicated to technologies that give humans power, ether physically, like flying in a plane, or psychologically, as in having feature 'X' in whatever (like 32-bit-float removes clipping, in my case). There's no one to complain to. I'm not sure, privately Adler and Gu would argue with your suggestion that they've written for the grant, not the truth. They might say, "yes, we wrote our abstract to fit into current funding realities, but you can read the whole report and make the right conclusions, which you did." But I wouldn't be surprised if they just said you were wrong.
People need fantasies to survive it seems. We can't agree on common goals, happiness, etc. There's not a single issue all democrats and republicans would agree on. Not a single one! I mean, sure, everyone wants good health. But not 100% agreement on who is responsible for it.
One of my favorite Neil DeGrasse Tyson rants is where he points out we didn't put men on the moon for science, we did it to put Russia in its place. If science was really our interest, we would have put all that effort into robotic missions.
Anyway, I really enjoyed this piece. I too succumb to framing everything in the CO2 narrative. You help me see through that distortion.
HAHA! Yes, I use the "to 11" all the time! I haven't heard the Led Zep story. THANKS! I guess that would be recording at a gigaherz sampling rate--if there is such a thing.
Thanks for helping keep humans and AI somewhat connected to physical observations, Anastassia. I'll close my next blog post with this.
The grid collapse in Spain/Portugal is something that they know the cause of, but will not speak openly:
The explanation of the Spanish and Portuguese grid failure Monday, describing atmospheric conditions as the cause, struck me immediately as incompatible with what appeared to be a sudden huge induction of current in high voltage transmission-lines, implying action in the global electrical circuit, but there was not a coronal mass ejection or unusually high plasma stream at the time, which would readily explain it.
My NASA friend, Mel says NASA has been warning (not the public) about these "wormhole" conductive anomalies suddenly arising, to exactly this effect. There will be more of this. Will it be openly disclosed?
Red caught Ben Davidson's live broadcast Monday evening, which I summarize here:
Official explanation is "only half a lie".
Ben is showboating, taking his time to get to the point, sigh...
He gets more coherent at 7:00 minutes. 7-10 minutes gives the explanation.
"This was a weak spot in Earth's magnetic field, which allowed a solar wind plasma penetration" that shot down to the high pressure area over Europe, making a "flash" Ben can see , but we don't have that screen...
Magnetic poles on Uranus and Neptune happen to be shifting right now, according to the James Webb telescope...
Excellent analysis and reading between the lines! I’ve read articles about marine life, and suddenly, there is a sentence to the effect that climate change is real, in a discussion that has nothing to do with climate.
I feel like black-robed scholars (instead of white-robed) are feeding us a dogma based on their beliefs without supporting data, where one can see for themselves.
I have 3 acres of Rabbiteye type Blueberries. I helped my Dad plant most of them back in 1980 and 1982. When we started picking them in the 1990s they got ripe in mid to late July.
Now they get ripe in late May to early June. The bag of frozen berries I opened to day were marked May 26, 2024. I don't understand all the back and forth blah, blah on global warming is climate change and it's all a hoax, but those blueberries tell me SOMETHING has changed.
I used to kayak on the White Sea in May-June, for many years. Then it became increasingly difficult to follow the same route, as the winds (which were quite predictable and persistent) changed their dominant directions and began to fluctuate more than they used to.
Definitely SOMETHING has changed. Here we are not questioning global warming or climate change, but trying to understand how human degradation of the biosphere could have contributed to the observed destabilization.
In short, some studies argue that the Hunga Tonga eruption could cause some warming, others that it, if anything, could cause some cooling. No much effect it seems.
But, for the record, if you look at Figure 7 in the post, there is a negative precipitation anomaly marked with "V". It was a volcano eruption.
we can see in the following figure how reanalysis (ERA5L) and observation (FluxCOM) show opposite sign of ET change over time compared to CMIP models and satellite. It is the satellite data which is used in CMIP tuning, I think. If the tuning data are biased then so are the insights drawn from models. The ERA is definitely outside the CMIP envelope which should raise some eyebrows. As far as I can tell the ERA5 will be accused of being at fault.
apparently some critical tipping point occurred in 1990s, when previously ET seemed to be increasing with temperature. but since then it decreases in ERA5L. This suggests the past 30 years having stressors not captured in CMIP. Satellite data by detecting basically vegetation greenness necessarily misses the soil stress which could be up to 50% of ET.
Thank you very much for that link. "ERA5 will be accused of being at fault" -- we should see. There is a lot of turmoil right now, not just with atmospheric dynamics but also with the carbon cycle, and everything else.
I've been studying a phenomena in audio "science". 32-bit-float recording. I've done many videos on it, some stories, here's one of the latest, but I wouldn't waste time watching. Here for reference: https://youtu.be/ZFhW0PQkFP4
The bottom line is content creators want a new super-power. They'd rather believe in a magic feature, that doesn't work, then the principles need to record good audio. Fascinating to me!
99.9% of science is dedicated to technologies that give humans power, ether physically, like flying in a plane, or psychologically, as in having feature 'X' in whatever (like 32-bit-float removes clipping, in my case). There's no one to complain to. I'm not sure, privately Adler and Gu would argue with your suggestion that they've written for the grant, not the truth. They might say, "yes, we wrote our abstract to fit into current funding realities, but you can read the whole report and make the right conclusions, which you did." But I wouldn't be surprised if they just said you were wrong.
People need fantasies to survive it seems. We can't agree on common goals, happiness, etc. There's not a single issue all democrats and republicans would agree on. Not a single one! I mean, sure, everyone wants good health. But not 100% agreement on who is responsible for it.
One of my favorite Neil DeGrasse Tyson rants is where he points out we didn't put men on the moon for science, we did it to put Russia in its place. If science was really our interest, we would have put all that effort into robotic missions.
Anyway, I really enjoyed this piece. I too succumb to framing everything in the CO2 narrative. You help me see through that distortion.
"But this one goes to eleven..."
;-)
(Do you really want to eliminate clipping, or is it cooler to hit the tape really hard at 7.5 ips, like on Led Zeppelin-II?)
HAHA! Yes, I use the "to 11" all the time! I haven't heard the Led Zep story. THANKS! I guess that would be recording at a gigaherz sampling rate--if there is such a thing.
Thanks for helping keep humans and AI somewhat connected to physical observations, Anastassia. I'll close my next blog post with this.
The grid collapse in Spain/Portugal is something that they know the cause of, but will not speak openly:
The explanation of the Spanish and Portuguese grid failure Monday, describing atmospheric conditions as the cause, struck me immediately as incompatible with what appeared to be a sudden huge induction of current in high voltage transmission-lines, implying action in the global electrical circuit, but there was not a coronal mass ejection or unusually high plasma stream at the time, which would readily explain it.
My NASA friend, Mel says NASA has been warning (not the public) about these "wormhole" conductive anomalies suddenly arising, to exactly this effect. There will be more of this. Will it be openly disclosed?
Red caught Ben Davidson's live broadcast Monday evening, which I summarize here:
Official explanation is "only half a lie".
Ben is showboating, taking his time to get to the point, sigh...
He gets more coherent at 7:00 minutes. 7-10 minutes gives the explanation.
"This was a weak spot in Earth's magnetic field, which allowed a solar wind plasma penetration" that shot down to the high pressure area over Europe, making a "flash" Ben can see , but we don't have that screen...
Magnetic poles on Uranus and Neptune happen to be shifting right now, according to the James Webb telescope...
We could have a Carrington event any day. "You need to be prepping yesterday." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYuPQ2NbkwA&t=7s
Excellent analysis and reading between the lines! I’ve read articles about marine life, and suddenly, there is a sentence to the effect that climate change is real, in a discussion that has nothing to do with climate.
I feel like black-robed scholars (instead of white-robed) are feeding us a dogma based on their beliefs without supporting data, where one can see for themselves.
I have 3 acres of Rabbiteye type Blueberries. I helped my Dad plant most of them back in 1980 and 1982. When we started picking them in the 1990s they got ripe in mid to late July.
Now they get ripe in late May to early June. The bag of frozen berries I opened to day were marked May 26, 2024. I don't understand all the back and forth blah, blah on global warming is climate change and it's all a hoax, but those blueberries tell me SOMETHING has changed.
I used to kayak on the White Sea in May-June, for many years. Then it became increasingly difficult to follow the same route, as the winds (which were quite predictable and persistent) changed their dominant directions and began to fluctuate more than they used to.
Definitely SOMETHING has changed. Here we are not questioning global warming or climate change, but trying to understand how human degradation of the biosphere could have contributed to the observed destabilization.
Again very thought provoking. As our expression goes, "The devil is in the detail." But in simple terms Earth tries to equilibrate increased warming in the tropics due to the the solar energy imbalance. You must be familiar with Arctic News on Blogspot but I'll put in this link to a graph on their landing page that suggests the excess energy is doubling every ten years or so: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhl8HVy1R2UcKutfMLgc41Wet9dojQDCVuWkqC-unuVHH14PSQ6J9STMbUEcTSafgCHp71S3nmr1mTLpjtDT8hXQ-RWJXGvP8mI8MDvtgDg_STCuTGB7LPvdUXjQiV-vVNwPFd_wj7_IwMvryQrpStepE_1DvEA4-GYJFfGumykTU0Mwsi_5ThauPziG_U/s1000/Energy-Imbalance-of-Earth.jpg
Thank you for the link. Here we are not questioning the warming. We are trying to disentangle why models don't get the precipitation right.
Makes one wonder how the Hunga Tonga eruption might have skewed the data.
I had a brief discussion of this on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7291408291224580096?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A7291408291224580096%2C7291787067187982337%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287291787067187982337%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7291408291224580096%29
In short, some studies argue that the Hunga Tonga eruption could cause some warming, others that it, if anything, could cause some cooling. No much effect it seems.
But, for the record, if you look at Figure 7 in the post, there is a negative precipitation anomaly marked with "V". It was a volcano eruption.
we can see in the following figure how reanalysis (ERA5L) and observation (FluxCOM) show opposite sign of ET change over time compared to CMIP models and satellite. It is the satellite data which is used in CMIP tuning, I think. If the tuning data are biased then so are the insights drawn from models. The ERA is definitely outside the CMIP envelope which should raise some eyebrows. As far as I can tell the ERA5 will be accused of being at fault.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-03271-7/figures/6
apparently some critical tipping point occurred in 1990s, when previously ET seemed to be increasing with temperature. but since then it decreases in ERA5L. This suggests the past 30 years having stressors not captured in CMIP. Satellite data by detecting basically vegetation greenness necessarily misses the soil stress which could be up to 50% of ET.
Thank you very much for that link. "ERA5 will be accused of being at fault" -- we should see. There is a lot of turmoil right now, not just with atmospheric dynamics but also with the carbon cycle, and everything else.