Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruce Danckwerts's avatar

Dear Anastassia, Thanks for posting this on your Substack - it will certainly help it to get a much wider audience than my limited network. So I really appreciate your help. I do want to apologize that one of the links seems to be linking to one of my radio programs (that discussed using the miter drains of roads to capture water) which I hope readers might still find interesting, even though it wasn't the intended file! I have just done a quick check, and I cannot see where the problem lies. I believe the missing file was one on "Designated Small Stick Harvesters" (which explains how I am trying to convert charcoal burners into Small Stick Harvesters) and it can be found at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1keAy0oWNx8jsOqnrN28aMcxjHtTNjAiV/view?usp=sharing I hope that helps anyone who would like to look into this aspect in more detail.

Bruce Danckwerts, CHOMA, Zambia www.radio4pasa.com/Bring_back_the_rains

Expand full comment
Anastassia Makarieva's avatar

Dear Bruce, thank you for your critical analysis of evidence as ever, greatly appreciated and welcome. Regarding record high of the Limpopo river versus low Zambezi river, I can say the following.

First, the Limpopo river drains an area of 0.4 million square km and has a discharge of 14 cubic kilometers/year. The Zambezi river drains an area of 1.9 million square km with a discharge of 117 cubic kilometers/year. (Data from Dai and Trenberth (2002) https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003%3C0660:EOFDFC%3E2.0.CO;2 , while https://worldinmaps.com/rivers/limpopo/ and

https://worldinmaps.com/rivers/zambezi/ are approximately consistent).

Therefore, it would require a forty times more significant precipitation anomaly (in absolute terms) to change the usual Zambezi's discharge by the same relative amount as Limpopo's. Or, to put it another way, a relative small precipitation anomaly could significantly perturb the Limpopo's discharge while going unnoticed in the Zambezi regions.

Second, the Limpopo basin is on average considerably closer to the ocean than the Zambezi's basin. Global change models consistently predict higher rainfall over the ocean in a warming climate -- I will explain this hopefully in my next post -- largely due to increasing absorption of solar energy as the ice shields melt and a shifting proportion of more latent heat versus sensible heat at constant relative humidity and rising temperature. So this increase in oceanic precipitation can also influence coastal regions but less so the inner parts of the continent. Even deserts occasionally get flooded (because of the positive feedback between precipitation and moisture convergence that I discussed in Biotic Pump Q&A https://bioticregulation.substack.com/p/biotic-pump-q-and-a

Theoretically, increasing water content in the air over the warmer ocean could (at least partially) compensate the decline in biotic pump functioning due to deforestation. That is, the ocean-to-land winds would weaken but those that still arrive to land would carry more vapor. But as I discussed in "We are losing soil moisture, why?" https://bioticregulation.substack.com/p/we-are-losing-soil-moisture-why this is not what appears to be happening and the biotic pump decline does not appear to be compensated.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts